Warning: Libraries and reading may have beneficial effects on your health. This according to a Japanese study:

https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20250624/p2a/00m/0li/017000c

Interestingly enough, libraries can benefit even non-readers, which I guess makes sense too, given the services and community spaces many libraries have on offer, apart from their collections.

According to this study, the benefits are particularly apparent when it comes to seniors:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000163

In any case, if I ever reach the stage when I need to be in a nursing home, I'll go willingly ... provided the home has a well-stocked and well-staffed on-site library!
So I was in the Carleton University Library, wrestling with some kind of big machine, most likely for microforms (microfilm reels or fiche or both - some of them used to have interchangeable attachments). I needed to print off some important official documents, in preparation for a job interview. Not sure what specific documents I needed, but I'm guessing some or all of the following:

A copy of my degree(s)
A transcript of my marks
A thesis or award-winning essay or project of some sort
Certificates, letters of recommendation

Of course, the machine wasn't working properly. Worse, there was someone there waiting to use the machine after I was done. I asked her if she knew anything about these machines & how to operate and/or fix them. "Not really," she replied. I asked her if there were other microform reader/printers in another part of the library or even somewhere else on campus. "No," she said, "They used to have them but they got rid of them."

I tried all the things they used to tell you to do: turning the machine off and then back on again, checking that there was paper in there, etc. Maybe we could find a library staff member somewhere who could assist us? But of course, there was no such person around.

So then I looked through my folder to see what I DID have already. I suddenly realized that the interview I had assumed would be on campus was in fact being held somewhere off site and I had no idea how I was going to figure out where exactly it was and how I'd get there.

At that point Dianora, who was elsewhere in the library working on her own stuff, stopped by to see where I was at with everything.

"D'ya s'pose you could drive me to my job interview?" I asked plaintively.

"Of course," she said. "Where do you need to be, and at what time?"

"That's what I'm trying to figure out!" I wailed, and resumed pawing through papers in the collapsible folder, which was itself close to collapse, as was I!

I noted that I did have copies of my resumé in there, except... they weren't good, final copies. They had all sorts of handwritten notes all over them, where I'd planned to make revisions or add stuff. I looked through them carefully and saw that on some of them, the handwriting was actually fairly neat. Maybe I could provide one of those copies to my interviewers and indicate that a final copy would follow?

I was still rummaging through the whole mess when I emerged from my dream, still feeling rather stressed.

P.S. I don't think I got the job.
I recently spent some time in Ireland, attending the World Library and Information Congress (WLIC) and seeing a few of the sights. Was it worthwhile? Unquestionably. The conference was a big deal in Dublin, with signs all over town welcoming the delegates. For the most part, we were lucky with the weather, I went to some great conference sessions and library visits, met some interesting people, did some sightseeing. More on all that in a forthcoming blog post.

That said, there are definitely some challenges involved in travelling anywhere, but especially internationally, during a pandemic.

WLIC is the annual conference of the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) and is held in a different city every year. Up to this year, I'd been to two WLICs: one in Quebec City in 2008 and one in Lyon, France, in 2014. This year's Dublin WLIC was originally supposed to take place in 2020 but when planning was already well underway, registrations accepted, flights and hotels booked... COVID intervened and proved to be rather more than the temporary snag that some of the organizers had initially expected. Of course, the conference was cancelled. But in short order, conference organizers at IFLA and their members in Dublin were actively planning for WLIC2022.

The official airline for WLIC Dublin was Aer Lingus. It's not an airline I would use again. Let me explain.

I booked a flight back in 2020, at a preferential conference rate. When air travel came to a screeching halt with COVID, the airline offered me a voucher for the full amount I'd paid, to be valid for 5 years from the date services resumed. There was at least a strong hint that if I agreed to a voucher as opposed to holding out for a cash refund, it would be a very quick, easy process and I would have my voucher in hand within a couple of weeks or months. I knew that I wouldn't be travelling for a while but I also knew I still wanted to go to Dublin for the 2022 conference. All in all, it seemed like a reasonable offer. So I accepted it.

Then I waited. The Aer Lingus site kept boasting during 2020 that 50%, then 75%, then 95% of vouchers had been issue. So where was mine? I followed up several times by e-mail and was met by a wall of silence.

The months went by. 2021 came and went. I guess I didn't seriously panic until early bird registration for the 2022 conference opened and there was still no sign of my voucher. I phoned the toll-free number on their site and waited endlessly on hold. I completed forms on the Aer Lingus site. I did eventually get an e-mailed reply and it was all pretty unbelievable.

Aer Lingus Agent claimed they could only issue vouchers in Euros, UK pounds or US dollars. This directly contradicted information on the Aer Lingus site indicating that all vouchers would be issued in the same currency in which the original booking was made. I briefly browsed the flight schedules to see if I could figure out how to book a return flight from a Canadian destination and pay (or even just see the prices) in anything other than Canadian dollars. I replied to Aer Lingus Agent's e-mail explaining my dilemma but any hopes of a prompt reply were soon dashed.

So what to do? Well, Aer Lingus was supposed to be THE official conference airline, right? And I was already registered for the conference. So I sent off a plaintive e-mail to the conference organizers, asking: Do you have a contact person at Aer Lingus who could help me with my voucher/booking problems?

And honestly, I cannot praise those folks highly enough! Almost instantaneously (even allowing for the 5-hour time difference between Ottawa and Dublin), they gave me contact details for an Aer Lingus person who could help. At first, she suggested maybe I could identify the specific flights I wanted and she would book them on my behalf. This I did, but over the course of the day, I think she decided that her suggestion was not really that practical after all. She said she would arrange for a refund to my credit card of the full amount I had paid (back in 2020) and it would be processed within 3 to 5 business days.

Sure enough, I saw the refund in my online banking 3 days later. Wow.

I must admit, however, that my gratitude did not extend to using the money to re-book with Aer Lingus. Instead, I looked at flights on the two major Canadian airlines I'm familiar with, Air Canada and Westjet.

In my next instalment, I'll let you know what happened next.
October is Canadian Library Month:

https://librarianship.ca/features/canadian-library-month/

In September, Catherine Ross died. She was a professor and long-time dean of the School of Library and Information Science (SLIS) at Western University, the same institution where I earned my degree:

https://www.fims.uwo.ca/news/2021/in_memoriam_catherine_ross.html

In the early 1990s with library schools falling on hard times and even struggling for their survival, Dr. Ross played a key role in the union of SLIS with Western's schoolof journalism to form a symbiotic whole, the Faculty of Information and Media Studies (FIMS).

So my donation for this month goes to a fund in her name, which will provide bursaries enabling students to pursue their studies at FIMS.
Happy International Special Librarians Day (ISLD) everyone! It has been 30 years since the first ISLD was announced. For that occasion I, along with many other colleagues in my profession, got a special kit from the Special Libraries association. I still have some items from that kit, most notably a coffee mug from which I drank my breakfast coffee this morning. The pens have long since been lost, discarded or given away but I do still have one or two pads of the sticky-notes and pin-on badges from that kit.

Every year there is a slightly different theme or slogan - the first was "Information Beyond Borders: Building Global Partnerships" and had a globe logo which was on all the publicity materials. Later, the name of the occasion was changed to Information Ethics Day:

https://targetstudy.com/knowledge/day/238/international-special-librarians-day-information-ethics-day.html

The idea of information ethics struck me as being particularly important as I read the recent book by Richard Ovenden (director of the Bodleian Library at Oxford), Burning The Books, in which he looks at instances of the destruction (whether deliberate or otherwise) of human knowledge in the form of books, archival documents and digital files throughout history.

Earlier this week, final drawings are to be released for the new superlibrary - a combined Ottwawa Public Library and Library & Archives Canada to be built at 555 Wellington:

https://inspire555.ca/welcome

All of which brings me to the recipient of my donation this week, the LAC (Library and Archives Canada) foundation:

https://lacfoundation.ca/

Books and reading have played a huge role in keeping me semi-sane during the pandemic and the long stretches of lockdowns and stay-at-home orders. I'm sure many, many people around the world feel the same way. So happy reading everyone, whatever your particular literary poison!
Today, December 10, is Dewey Decimal System Day:

https://nationaltoday.com/dewey-decimal-system-day/amp/?fbclid=IwAR3eXDw5SXo0H2ve6nsLOSSnyHgItwVsXb07VNxRZZBOv1KnUpKnWhis_pw

The Dewey Decimal System has had a profound impact on most of our lives, whether we realize it or not. Most public libraries in Canada, as well as in many countries throughout the world, use Dewey Classification to organize at least their non-fiction sections. For kids who cut their teeth on public library resources to help them prepare school projects of progressively greater complexity, I can't help but think that the Dewey classification must have coloured the lens through which they perceived the entirety of the world they lived in.

Many of our school library collections are also organized by Dewey numbers. To help kids orient themselves and make use of the library in a constructive but enjoyable way, there are various books available. Like this one by Brian Cleary:

https://www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/do-you-know-dewey-exploring/9780761366768-item.html?ikwid=dewey&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=13#algoliaQueryId=236abd696eb4c92218e5e04c6424a0c1

So who was Melvil Dewey? His contributions to library science are indisputable but what about the man himself? I learned quite a few new details about him myself in this interview with Alexis O'Neill, author of a recent biopic of him geared to kids in the 7 to 10 age group:

https://www.goodreadswithronna.com/2020/12/10/an-interview-with-alexis-oneill-about-melvil-dewey/

It's interesting to speculate what he would have made of the age of social media.
As in Libraries, Archives and Museums? Though nowadays they seem to use the acronym GLAM (the G standing for Galleries) or even the much less acronymically inclined GLAMR to include Records management as well. Sometimes we may not recognize the significance of events at the time they occur but 2020 has become for a huge swath of the world's population The Year of the Pandemic. Many of us are capturing history in the making, but archivists are perhaps at the forefront:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/hindsight-2020-how-archivists-work-to-remember-a-year-most-would-rather-forget-1.5213265?fbclid=IwAR2gzxmpcIIWT8CFgqanPYYBz5VDazVn4yFjhIiVOHtD_bXEPqkiZ6zfE3g

And most of it is far from GLAMR-ous.

As for the year of the LAM? Well, we'll have to wait until 2027 for another Year of the Sheep, also sometimes called the Year of the Ram or the Year of the Goat.

Meanwhile, 2019 was a Pig of a year, when the virus first started to go hog-wild. We're still in the Year of the Rat, and rats are of course associated with great plagues and disease and death. We've paid the piper as best we can this year, but he's already marched off with a lot of the world's population, more oldsters than youngsters.

But take heart - 2021 will be the Year of the Ox, beginning around early February and with new vaccines providing herd immunity, perhaps we will all be as strong as oxen!
There's a move afoot in Canada to have a dedicated 911 line for suicide prevention, similar to the 988 service offered in many parts of the U.S. Clearly suicide is not a new problem, but as mental health worsens amid pandemic restrictions, concern is growing proportionately. Here's what Crisis Services Canada have to say on the matter:

https://suicideprevention.ca/COVID-19

And here is a list of crisis lines, not just for Canada but for other countries as well:

https://thelifelinecanada.ca/help/call/

In the U.K., my brother used to volunteer with The Samaritans - I'm guessing the closest local equivalent would be the Distress Centre, although we also have a Kids' Help Phone and various special-purpose services such as those geared to the LGBT+ community.

Suicide, whether contemplated, averted or achieved, also features widely in literature and film. Many will be familiar with the 1946 holiday film classic "It's A Wonderful Life" in which George Bailey decides that he does want to keep living after all, once his guardian angel has shown him what his world, as he's lived it, would have been like if he'd never been born.

The book I'm reading now, The Midnight Library, offers another spin on the idea. Thirty-five year-old Nora Seed has decided to end it all. Then we get brief flashbacks to what happened nineteen years before she reached that decision, then 27 hours before, 9 hours, five hours, and so on, until she comes to write her suicide note.

At the zero hour, she find herself in a library, with a librarian who reminds her of her school librarian from 19 years ago. But this is no ordinary library - it's a library between life and death. All the books in it are the story of her life. But that doesn't mean they are all copies of the same book.

Then there's The Book of Regrets. It's a very heavy book. Well, wouldn't you expect that someone who had decided to end it all would have plenty of regrets about how she's lived her life?

So she picks a regret. Her cat died and she regrets that she didn't look after him better. She asks the librarian for the version of her life in which she kept the cat inside so he couldn't get run over. She lives that life for the next dozen pages or so until she finds herself getting dissatisfied with that alternate version of her life too ... at which point she finds herself back in the library, where she can ask the librarian for a different version of her biography. And so it goes.

Well, I guess when you get to a certain age, you're bound to have a number of "should'ves" in life. Matt Haig's book The Midnight Library adds a few layers of complexity to the storyline of those feel-good Christmas movies. I mean sure, if George Bailey had never been born, his brother would have drowned instead of becoming a war hero. The druggist would have poisoned a bunch of patients. Then again, maybe his wife would have become the Librarian of Congress and Annie the maid would have been a Black Lives Matter heroine with her picture on the ten-dollar bill. You never know.

Still, the book is feel-good in some ways. It might make you feel better about not having done some of the things that you think you should have done. I'm not sure that it will prevent any suicides, but that's a pretty tall order for any book. And this one is definitely worth a read.
Apparently John Cleese wants to be buried along with all his unread books:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/books/review/john-cleese-by-the-book-interview.html

I wonder how that would work. Would there be a John Cleese Cryptic Memorial Library that people could actually visit? Specially sculpted bookends with hollowed-out interiors, each holding a teaspoon or so of his cremated remains?

More likely, I suspect, is that everything would be permanently encased in a very large coffin under Mount Cleese, entirely closed off from public viewing by those of us above ground.

I guess that's fine if you believe in an afterlife and can picture him living on in the underworld, happily enjoying his books. But we're a long time dead. Surely he would run out of reading material sooner or later?

For librarians and archivists keen to preserve our documentary heritage for posterity, it's a little depressing to think of somebody hoarding away the books he never had time to read, preventing anyone who COULD realistically enjoy them from doing so! Perhaps the family could compile a list of books being buried and maybe even retain digitized copies of some of them, particularly the ones that are out of print or utterly unique.

As I mull over how I could better organize my own personal library, I'm thinking about devising some annotations to explain why a few select books are particularly important to me or why they might be of particular interest to key people still here after I'm gone.

At my mother's final digs in a retirement residence, she only had room for one small bookcase. And yet, sometimes less is more. In a weird sort of way, I felt I gained a better understanding of her after she was gone, just from the limited choice of books she kept with her to the end.
Today's donation goes to the Canadian Writers' Emergency Fund:

https://www.writerstrust.com/?_ga=2.106787210.887544691.1602857920-1501988426.1602511844

There is a perception out there that since writing is essentially a solitary activity and one that occurs to a great extent online, writers' livelihoods are little affected by pandemic lockdowns and self-isolation. But that perception is not valid, for a number of reasons.

First and foremost, most writers are unable to earn a living from writing full-time at the best of times. During a pandemic, they are unable to connect with their readers at in-person events such as readings, book signings and literary conferences. If they write about geographically or historically distant locales, there are limits to the amount of research that can be conducted virtually. To achieve authenticity, there's no substitute for being there or in the case of historical research, experiencing the artefacts and primary sources first-hand.

Moreover, I think it's fair to say that many of us have a lot more time for reading these days, and are eager to use our reading time as a form of imaginative distancing. Meanwhile, libraries have been closed, in-person second-hand book sales have been non-existent and those bookshops that are open are having to limit the number of customers who can visit at any one time. At the height (depth?) of the lockdown, new reading matter for me was limited to those books I could buy online and have shipped to me. Those on more limited budgets were not so lucky.

If we want to continue to enjoy new work by some of the excellent emerging writers, we need to put our money where our reading glasses are!
I've always had a hankering to stay at one of the Library Collection of hotels. Like the Library Hotel in New York City. Or the Hotel X in Toronto. Now, though? I could not in all good conscience stay there after learning how this luxury hotel is treating its workers - or in some cases former workers:

https://workersactioncentre.org/taking-a-stand-for-workers-rights-and-income-supports-under-covid-19/

Hotel X recently changed its subcontracting arrangement, leaving 200 employees out of work and out of pocket for the hours they have already worked and severance pay to which they are entitled. In Ontario - unlike Quebec, for example - the new subcontractor can apparently wash its hands of any obligations its predecessor had to these mostly minimum-wage employees. And frankly, that stinks.
October is Library Month in Canada. And today also marks the beginning of First Nations Public Library Week:

https://fnplw.olsn.ca

My mini research project for today is to find out a bit about Juliana Armstrong of Nipissing First Nation, the artist behind the beautiful poster which you can view at the above URL. So far, I don't know much beyond what I've read on the sites of a few public libraries in Ontario, for example this one in Oshawa:

https://www.oshawalibrary.on.ca/fnplw

I did find an obituary for her brother, who died in January 2007 at the age of 26:

http://yourlifemoments.ca/sitepages/obituary.asp?oId=139058

If you're like me, reading has assumed an even greater part of your life since COVID-19 reared its ugly head earlier this year. And now, with virus numbers surging again, the weather getting colder and people cocooning indoors, books and reading are more important than ever as a tool for imaginative distancing.

What better time of year to celebrate libraries?
Over 40 years ago, I recall watching a film called something like The Hottest Spot in Town. What was that spot, you might ask? The public library! And today, after five months of self-isolation as potential Covid-19 hot-spots, most Ottawa area libraries have re-opened for in-person browsing:

https://biblioottawalibrary.ca/en/contactless-returns-and-holds-pickup-service

Certain precautions and restrictions are in place, of course. But in some ways, things are actually a little nicer than before. The loan period has been extended to four weeks from three. They'll hold a hold for you for two weeks instead of just one. Overdue fines have been suspended (a number of library systems, though not ours, have done away with them altogether).

It's not just people who've had to go into quarantine - it's books too! But the quarantine period for books is a little shorter: three days instead of 14. Technology may already be several steps ahead of our sometimes clunky human protocols and procedures - apparently a device already exists to kill Covid-19 on books in a mere 60 seconds:

https://mailchi.mp/ristech/the-lab-results-are-in-steri-book-kills-covid-19-in-60-seconds?e=b8cb32e68f

Perhaps we could replicate that in human clinical trials?
An article by Kenneth Whyte that appeared on Saturday in the Globe and Mail has sparked a firestorm of indignant outrage amongst librarians and others who care about books and reading. The gist of Whyte's argument is that libraries and book dealers are fierce competitors with each other and that moreover, libraries actually have an unfair advantage over bookshops because they are largely financed by public funds. I'll leave it to you, dear reader, to judge for yourself the merits of his claims:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-thanks-to-government-funding-libraries-are-poised-to-win-market-share/

To be sure, libraries and booksellers do have some goals in common and their owners, managers and other employees have overlapping skill sets. Indeed, there is a certain degree of crossover in the staff of both types of institutions. But their mandates and missions, while complementary, generally differ in a number of important ways.

I'm not going to explore all the theoretical or academic arguments here. Instead I want to focus on what it means for the everyday reader.

Maybe you subscribe to a few magazines. For example, Chatelaine or Walrus or Macleans. Although I'm thinking if I did subscribe to Macleans, I'd be sorely tempted to cancel my subscription after reading Whyte's article! But chances are, there are also other magazines which occasionally publish an article you'd like to read. If it comes to your attention when it first hits the newsstands then sure - you can buy a copy of that issue from your favourite bookstore. But where will you find the article once it's several months old? Chances are, you'll get it through your library.

Large bookstore chains are great for finding the latest bestsellers, often at deeply discounted prices. But what about books from smaller presses with limited print runs? Or books that have long been out of print? You can special-order them from a used book dealer if you know they exist and the price is within your budget. You can browse WorldCat. And I've had some serendipitous moments at Friends of the Farm and various school-based used book sales. But for treasure troves of books that are available in your neighbourhood, to browse on an ongoing basis - except maybe during a pandemic - I'd say the library is by far your best bet.

Bookstores are not all alike, of course. I make a special effort to support the smaller independent shops, which generally provide superior customer service. Quite often, they issue newsletters of their own, with helpful reviews and reader recommendations. Like libraries, they hold readings, signings and other book-oriented events which pay off in terms of both reader engagement and book sales. But events of that kind have been on hold for the past few months, and many independents are hurting.

So what can we do? I'll conclude by providing a link to the recent report entitled Independent Bookstores in Canada's Post-Covid Cultural Landscape. It has some useful and thought-provoking suggestions about the policy directions we might take.


https://www.morecanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Independent_Bookstores_in_Canadas_post-Covid_cultural_landscape.pdf
Does the order in which we re-open things reflect the priorities we as a society place upon them? Or only the priorities of a few chief decision-makers? And who ARE those decision makers? Politicians? Health experts? Businesspeople? Behind-the-scenes advisors? Professional lobbyists? The people who inspire the most collective guilt in us because of past injustices?

Of course, there are a few on both sides of the spectrum who completely reject the whole concept of a phased re-opening. It's either: (a) We can't even BEGIN to think about venturing out into the wider world until there's a reliable vaccine that's accessible to all; or (b) Let's just get back out there and let the chips fall where they may - life is the survival of the fittest! But most of us fall somewhere in between the two extremes - we just can't quite seem to agree on the right balance of risks and rewards.

Take schools, for example. The demand for 5-day-a-week in-person instruction beginning in September. And now that bar re-openings have begun, there's a "schools before bars" movement afoot, mostly from parents of school-aged kids. Some prominent public health people are also questioning the re-opening of bars at this stage too. But now there's also a growing chorus of concern from families where one or more members has a compromised immune system. They worry that they'll be pressured to send the kids back to school too soon, putting their lives and health in jeopardy. Strangely enough, I've heard nothing about, say, a "libraries before bars" initiative, although surely libraries are also important components of the educational process, and arguably THE central component when it comes to life-long learning!

I suppose a lot of the discord arises from the U.S. situation, where many states have been hard-hit by the virus and have been obliged to backtrack on their re-openings or double down on closing things in the first place. And certainly Canadian border towns like Windsor have been particularly vulnerable to U.S. mismanagement of the problem.

For those who are hunkering down for the long haul, prepared to put everything on hold until they can get vaccinated, I'm actually thinking we may get one sooner rather than later:

https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/coronavirusvaccinetracker/

No guarantees, of course. But if we could get a vaccine into doctors' offices and pharmacies before the flu season of 2020-21 gets going in earnest? That might be doable, I think.
Have you ever heard of the Marrakesh Treaty? If not, you're in good company. It's an international treaty adopted in 2013 by member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

With libraries around the world closed to walk-in clients due to the pandemic, accessibility of reading matter these days is an issue for everyone, and at a time when many of us suddenly have plenty of time to read! But inaccessibility has been an everyday reality throughout history for anybody who is print-disabled, as only about 7% of published works are available in accessible formats.

The Marrakesh Treaty removes certain legal barriers to making and sharing accessible format works, when done on a not-for-profit basis to provide services to the print-disabled. Of course, librarians have always been good at co-operative and reciprocal arrangements for pooling scarce resources. Under the treaty's provisions, libraries are free to co-ordinate the production of works in accessible formats. That means less duplication, less re-inventing the wheel because without such an agreement, the same book might be converted multiple times in different countries. Or even in different organizations within the same city.

In Canada, a guide for libraries to get started in implementing the treaty was recently issued as part of National AccessAbility Week, May 31 to June 6:

https://www.eifl.net/system/files/resources/201808/getting_started_marrakesh_en.pdf

One thing I hadn't realized (or maybe just hadn't considered) before was how wide an interpretation is given to the term "print-disabled". As well as blind or low-vision people, it can include people with learning or developmental disabilities such as dyslexia or autism or with physical problems like Parkinson's or paralysis that may impair the ability to hold a book or turn the pages.

As I juggle my various pairs of glasses - progressive bifocals, reading glasses, midrange glasses (sometimes nowadays referred to as "computer glasses") and sunglasses, I'll certainly want to keep up to date on this file.

The document cited above is a manageable 19 pages long but has plenty of links to other helpful resources. For readers in Canada, the most useful starting point might be the Centre for Equitable Library Service:

https://celalibrary.ca

Let's all work to alleviate the book famine!
It has been pointed out by a number of international organizations that accurate documentation becomes MORE important during a crisis, not less.

This may relate to political and legal actions - we still need to know where we stand with regard to our governments and our laws, we still have basic rights and we still should be confident as citizens of a democratic society that our rights and freedoms are being upheld. In that regard, I say kudos to Trudeau fils for NOT invoking the federal Emergencies Act. He did attempt to push through some rather draconian budget provisions which would have severely restrained parliamentary oversight, but
when that happened, the opposition parties worked as opposition parties are supposed to, and those provisions were modified. With a few notable exceptions, I've been reasonably satisfied with how the politicians in Canada are working together.

On the other hand, we do still have a problematic divide in this country between the information-rich and the information-poor. Some twenty to twenty-five years since home internet became fairly commonplace, there are still a lot of communication gaps and breakdowns, particularly now that you can't go to a library or internet café or visit a friend to use e-mail or other internet. It's partly an urban/rural thing and partly a matter of income distribution and other factors too.

There are some noisy Bell trucks in our neighbourhood right now installing fibre or cable or whatever. I'm told that should give us faster and more reliable internet service although the nitty gritty techie details of it elude me!

But aside from the difficulties in accessing cold hard facts and information, there is a certain level of CULTURAL poverty that sets in during a lockdown. You can't physically visit museums or art galleries or go to concerts or conferences or gastronomic events or craft fairs even in your OWN home town, let alone travelling and seeing the world! Yes, we're very fortunate to have the option of virtual visits to all these landmarks. And to the extent that we don't, it does certainly highlight the importance of further expanding electronic documentation of our heritage and culture. People increasingly see the need for it, whereas previously they might have considered it an appalling waste of money and other scarce resources. Here are a couple of links I found interesting:

https://librarianship.ca/news/statement-duty-to-document/

https://en.unesco.org/news/turning-threat-covid-19-opportunity-greater-support-documentary-heritage

It's been said that when a new technology comes along, it doesn't necessarily supplant previous ones. For example, we still listen to the radio even though we also have TV and video and Netflix. There's still a market for vinyl records even though we have CDs and MP3s and all manners of streaming. Of course, formats do become obsolete too - think 8-tracks and diskettes amongst others.

So yes, for now it's a bonus to be able to let our thumbs do the walking. But I have to say, I'm still looking forward to getting back to some of the OLD normal!
Please, sir - I want some more. Information, that is. About Covid-19.

Maybe that sounds completely ludicrous. Aren't we already bombarded with Covidformation every time we pick up a newspaper, turn on the TV or radio, or tune into a podcast?

Well, no. Getting data-bombed is not the same thing as informing oneself. Here are some of the areas where I would like more information:

1. Symptoms of Covid-19

2. Solutions

3. Testing - What kinds of tests are available, and when are they useful?

I'm going to discuss each in turn, although I know I'll only be scratching the surface of what needs to be considered.

First, the symptoms. Fever, dry cough, trouble breathing, loss of senses of smell and taste, double-lung pneumonia. All of those sound like the symptoms of a pretty serious disease. Yet in the next breath, officials tell us that in many (perhaps most) cases, the symptoms are mild and resemble those of the common cold. In my experience, when you get a cold, you don't usually have a fever, or not a very high one anyway. Dry cough? Maybe, but usually it's a rather wet, phlegmy one, at least in the initial stages. And they say that a runny nose is not usually a symptom of Covid 19. Trouble breathing and loss of senses of smell and taste? Well, yes - up to a point. If your nose is all stuffed up and you have to breathe through your mouth, you're not going to be able to smell things very well. And you probably won't taste much either, because the senses of smell and taste are interconnected. Double-lung pneumonia? That's definitely not the same thing as a cold, although certainly a cold can lead to more serious diseases while your resistance is lowered.

So, on to solutions. A vaccine is touted as the ultimate solution, the holy grail, the elixir of life. And I absolutely agree - we definitely should and must work towards developing a vaccine. But is it necessarily the ONLY solution? Are there other options we could explore? What about anti-viral or other drugs, for example? You might say they're a cure rather than a prevention, but it ain't necessarily so - drugs are used preventatively as well as to alleviate symptoms and provide (along with time and TLC) a cure. What about birth control, for example? Or arthritis drugs? For rheumatoid arthritis, I am taking both NSAIDs (Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs) and DMARDs (Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs). One of the DMARDs that has been prescribed to me is Hydroxychloroquine, often known as Plaquenil. And interestingly enough, that's one of the drugs that seems to be showing some promise in the treatment of coronavirus too. I'm rather hoping that my own supply line doesn't dry up, although luckily it's not the only weapon in my personal arsenal as I fight the war on arthritis.

Now, about testing. Apparently we need to test far more people than we have been. But when we do test, are we relying on just one type of test?

As I understand it, we are conducting swab tests. Results take time. The usefulness of the results is limited, too. I gather a person tests either positive or negative for the virus, meaning they either a) definitely do have it at time of testing; or b) don't have it, or are only within the first couple of days of contracting it so it may be a false negative that needs to be re-tested.

But are there, for example, other tests that test for having already HAD the virus, or having had a virus similar enough to Covid-19, or having ANTIBODIES to the virus for whatever reason? And if so, would a positive test result for them also mean that they would NOT be a carriers who could put others at risk? Maybe we could issue some sort of certificate to these people (sort of akin to a vaccination certificate) and they could get back out into the community, freed from physical distancing restrictions themselves and also in a position to help those still suffering? If there were enough of them, think what a boon to society that could be, both from a medical and an economic standpoint!

Remember those TB patch tests we used to get? After a family trip to the UK in 1962, my brother always tested positive on those and sometimes got sent off for a chest X-ray. He hadn't had an active case of tuberculosis but evidently he had been exposed to it. I, on the other hand, continued to test negative - I was a fair bit younger and probably not as free to mill about the streets of London.

On the other hand, I DID get pneumonia in the mid-1980s. And then in the summer of 2018, I contracted a nasty lung ailment. My doctor initially decided to treat it as if were pneumonia, even though she had already given me the vaccine, which (unlike the flu vaccine) is supposed to be a one-time thing. I went through the usual diagnoses and treatments - the chest x-ray, the inhaler, the meds, some breathing tests. The symptoms were similar to those of diseases which typically plague smokers, even though I am not a smoker.

I'm not sure she ever did pinpoint what exactly I had had. The good news is that I recovered, although it took a few months. I'm pretty sure I picked it up during Music and Beyond, in early July (lots of crowded venues at a festival like that). It wasn't until some time in October that I got my final breathing test and a clean bill of health.

Could it have been something akin to Covid-19, even if they hadn't identified it yet? And if so, is there a possibility that it could have conferred on me some immunity from, or at least resistance to this nasty virus? I guess I can always hope.

So those are some of the questions uppermost in my mind at the moment.

You know, I have a sweatshirt with this slogan on it: Google can find you 100,000 answers. A librarian will find you the right one.

During this pandemic, people are relying on Google like never before, but libraries are closed. Will people be able to find the right answers before googols and googolplexes of people get infected? Or do I mean googols and googolplexes of the virus since I know there are only a few billion people in the world?

I guess maybe I'm a failure as a librarian because right now, I certainly haven't found the answer. I'm not at all confident that there IS just one right answer - there rarely is.

But right now, I'd settle for a half-decent answer - even if it's multiple choice.
What goods and services do you consider to be essential? Perhaps almost every one of us would offer up a slightly different list. One reaction I've heard quite a bit is "How come the LCBO is still open, but libraries are closed? Which is really a two-part question, when you come right down to it: first, why are liquor stores still open; and second, why are libraries closed?

Personally I believe they should both be open to some degree - and in fact, they are.

One obvious reason for continuing to sell liquor - and, for that matter, beer, wine and cannabis and possibly cigarettes, at least the electronic type - is that in addition to being perfectly legal (within certain parameters, obviously), they are a welcome source of government revenue at a time when additional revenue is sorely needed. If consumed sensibly, they also are beneficial at least to our mental health, allowing for a few small pleasures at a time when the world is stressed and anxious.

So on to libraries. Most public libraries are still offering e-books, videos and other resources remotely. Many library-based groups that used to meet in person are still meeting up online. Virtual library tours and orientations are still possible, although I'm not sure to what degree they're being used. And virtual reference has been a virtual reality for quite some time now.

But I do think they could up the ante a bit on their mobile and pickup & delivery services. Maybe some contactless homebound services to deliver "real" printed books to shut-ins and the self-isolating? You know, even in good times, most visitors to the library are expected to use self-checkout, so surely it's not such a leap to do this, assuming the books can be adequately sanitized before they go out to a new borrower. And then there are other things that some libraries lend out, like musical instruments and tools.

Of course, some services offered by libraries - for example, a quiet place to read or study or do homework, a place to use the internet if you don't have a computer or reliable internet at home, a place for homeless or other disadvantaged groups to hang out or just use the washroom, and some of the children's services too - are very much dependent on The Library as Place. Those are the kinds of things that I agree will need to be put on hold for now.

At the same time, there have been some unintended consequences of the drive towards making reading matter more readily available under pandemic conditions. Brewster Kahle, architect of the (U.S.-based) Internet Archive, has now set up a National Emergency Library, a seemingly unilateral decision for which he has been both lauded and reviled. Yesterday he posted on lessons learned from the first two weeks:

https://blog.archive.org/2020/04/07/the-national-emergency-library-who-needs-it-who-reads-it-lessons-from-the-first-two-weeks/

One of the more problematic decisions was to eliminate controlled digital lending so that those wishing to read a book still under copyright (as opposed to an older one now in the public domain) are no longer accessing a specific digital "copy" owned by the library. As many readers as wish to may access the book simultaneously. So no more wait lists!

Now, that may seem like a paradise for readers. Not so much for authors who no longer get any money from the public lending fees paid by libraries. Nor for booksellers or publishers who expect, quite reasonably, to make at least a modest profit from selling copies of books that are wildly popular at the library and have long wait lists. It wouldn't be so bad if there had been some sort of general appeal sent out to authors, asking if they would voluntarily release some of their work to be used in this matter. To add insult to injury, the Internet Archive claims to be a nonprofit and actively solicits donations from users, but makes no mention (as far as I could tell) as to whether any of this money makes its way back to those who (willingly or otherwise) have contributed the content.

Does the end justify the means? I'm not so sure, especially when I read of the number of library workers (particularly casual and part-time people with insecure incomes) who have been involuntarily laid off with no pay as a result of the closure of library buildings.

I became aware of this on reading Canadian mystery author Rick Blechta's April 7 post on http://typem4murder.blogspot.com

I have to say he was a little more moderate in his criticism of this than I would have been in his shoes.

I should add that there is also an Internet Archive Canada, established eight years later than Kahle's site, but serving as a kind of companion site. The Canadian Libraries page is well worth a visit, at https://archive.org The main centres of the Internet Archive Canada are at the University of Toronto and the University of Alberta, although there are about 30 different scanning sites across Canada. I THINK the Canadian archive is separately managed and I really hope that when it comes to new copyrighted work, it won't just blithely ignore responsible digital rights management. I've raised the issue with some of my Ex Libris colleagues and they are definitely interested in how this pans out.

We shall see.
The past week-and-a-bit have felt busy, though in a good way. On February 21, we went to the annual Elmdale school book sale, which this year (due, I presume, to labour action by the teachers' unions) was held at Fisher Park Community Centre. We came away, as usual, with a good haul, including a couple of kids' books - Swallows and Amazons, by Arthur Ransome (which oddly enough no longer seems to be readily available in major bookstores) and Jo's Boys, by Louisa May Alcott.

We saw the most recent movie version of Little Women, as well as an older one that aired on the Turner Classic Movies channel and starred Katharine Hepburn as Jo. Mainly for that reason, I had the urge to re-read the book - I didn't find a copy at the sale, although we may (or may not) have a copy lurking somewhere in one of our overstuffed bookcases and I suspect it's easier to obtain than the Arthur Ransome books. I still have a book containing some of the lesser-known thrillers penned by Alcott, which I picked up at an earlier book sale.

Then on Wednesday, I picked up a book I had requested at the library - The Man in the Red Coat, by Julian Barnes. I had read a review of it in the December issue of Totally British magazine and thought it sounded interesting, so that's what I'm reading now. And I see today, there's also a review of it on the Citizen's books page. Anyway, if you're into the cultural life of Belle Epoque France and Anglo-Franco relations in the late 19th century and dandies and decadents, this is the book for you. It's bringing back lots of memories of the authors I studied in French literature courses I took at Carleton in the early 1970s - Baudelaire, Flaubert, Mallarme and especially J.K. Huysmans' book A Rebours. I dug up my copy of that, still with a number of my pencil-marks in the margins, and will definitely be wanting to re-read it. I may also get around to reading a biography of Huysmans which I bought several years ago but have yet to read!

While at the library, I happened across and borrowed two other books from the recently received non-fiction section: Supporting Trans People in Libraries, by Stephen G. Krueger; and Fat, Pretty, and Soon to be Old: A Makeover for Self and Society, by Kimberley Dark. I may comment on those in a future entry.

Wednesday also marked our 44th anniversary, which we marked with a pizza lunch at the Colonnade and tiramisu for dessert (we'll be finishing some leftover pizza this evening, washed down with Beyond the Pale beer (either Darkness or Dangerous Sauce). Then on Wednesday evening, we went to a Murray McLauchlan concert at Centrepointe - something we actually might have been doing 44 years ago, although back then he probably would have appeared at a coffee house like Le Hibou!

On Thursday afternoon, I attended a session at Library and Archives Canada on the millennial shift in libraries - how they have changed the nature of library work and how well (or not) their values and priorities harmonize with the other generations (boomers, gen-x and even some pre-boomers and post-millennials) working with them. The panellists were from all types of libraries, Canadian and international. One attending in person was from Sweden; another joined us by teleconference from New Zealand, where it was already Friday morning!

Did I mention that this past week has been Freedom to Read week and February 19 was I Read Canadian Day? Actually I have been reading Canadian during the past month - Margaret Atwood's The Testaments and Daniel J. Levitin's latest book about aging well.

So anyway - today is leap day, hence the title of this post. Next Saturday we will be springing forward to Daylight Savings Time; also attending a Bach Choir concert. The following day, International Women's Day, we expect to attend our daughter's house concert & brunch. I also recently bought a Leap Card (for public transit in Dublin, where I'll be in August to attend the IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations) conference. Like I say, my life has been full.

Profile

blogcutter

August 2025

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
1011121314 1516
17181920212223
24 252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 31st, 2025 01:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios