This month's donation goes to the African Canadian Association of Ottawa:

https://acaottawa.com/

Like most of us, I have been shocked and appalled by news of the unprovoked attacks by Russian forces on civilians in Ukraine. Even more so when I hear of the plight of those already vulnerable people who are doubly disadvantaged by the colour of their skin.

Too much news-watching can be bad for one's health and tends to give rise to feelings of helplessness and defeatism. But even small gestures, especially by large groups of people, can be quite powerful.

Although I don't have friends or family stuck in Ukraine, my heart goes out to those who do.
During my high school and university days, it was the dawning of the Age of Androgyny. There were unisex jeans stores all over the place, along with the boutiques selling incense and Indian-print bedspreads, tops and dresses. It was an age not so much of gender diversity as gender uniformity. Everyone who had hair wore it long. Afros were a thing regardless of the colour of your skin. So was hair so straight you had to iron it regularly unless it was naturally perma-press.

Today marks the end of a mostly-virtual Pride Week. Yesterday I went on a bit of a rant at the Royal Canadian Navy over its RIMPAC exercise but today I'll highlight a couple of the more progressive measures they are taking towards inclusivity. Like their real-life Pride Parade on the canal:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/boat-pride-parade-rideau-canal-ottawa-1.5705150?cmp=rss

And their move towards more gender-inclusive job titles, still controversial in some quarters:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/royal-canadian-navy-seaman-sailor-1.5702842

But is there still room for gendered spaces in all this would-be broad-mindedness? Personally I hope so although if I were active on social media, I'm sure I'd face a flaming Twitter-storm of protest for that stance!

Some of the most positive environments I've been in in my life have been female-only. Like CGIT, like the Ottawa Women's Centre and the Consciousness-Raising group I briefly participated in during the mid-70s. Or like the Women's Committee of my union local at Labour Canada. Since I worked in a predominantly female occupation, there were also a number of all-female job environments I worked in too.

In many cultures, my own included, girls and boys were, and to a considerable extent still are treated differently. Certainly those of us growing up as girls and boys in Canada were not treated AS differently from each other as we would have been in some other parts of the world, but the differences were definitely there and have shaped our lives accordingly. For that reason, it's difficult if not impossible to ascertain precisely where nature leaves off and nurture kicks in when looking at sex-linked differences.

At this end of the twenty-first century, we are gradually adding concepts like gender identity and gender expression to our institutional framework of human rights. For the most part, I see this as positive. But it does bother me when I sense that we are no longer allowed to celebrate our differences and be our authentic selves. Take, for example, someone who dares to state publicly that trans-women are not quite the same as cis-women. I for one strongly believe that, even though (or perhaps precisely BECAUSE) trans-women are very much a part of my day to day reality. But I'm just a private individual, not a high-profile woman like, say, J.K. Rowling, who recently stood up for what she believed in by returning a human rights award she had received:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/rowling-award-return-1.5704196?cmp=rss

And what of gender expression? If someone who is male opts to wear a dress or any kind of garment or make-up or other items the culture regards as feminine, is that really gender expression? Or is it just personal expression, wearing what they feel comfortable in, or whatever?

And to go even farther out on a limb, what about the racial equivalents to these gendered categories?
Race has in recent years been acknowledged to be quite an artificial construct. You can't necessarily peg it conclusively by skin colour alone, or by any other overt quality that I know of. So why is it considered so appallingly racist and culturally misappropriating for an ostensibly white person to publicly appear in blackface or brown face, while men in dresses or drag queen story times are celebrated as examples of alternative gender expression? What about a black person like, say, Venus Williams, bleaching her hair? What about using skin lighteners? Do we need categories for racial identity and racial expression?

We should dare to ask some of these currently unaskable, politically incorrect questions because only then will we begin to address them and move towards a truly inclusive society.
I have long been a fan of Bridgehead and the whole notion of fair trade. I remember when they had a shop on Sussex Drive and an annual catalogue of fair trade items you could order. I was even a regular customer of the Bridgehead coffee shop on Wellington Street where the Abdirahman Abdi incident occurred. It was a pleasant place to while away the time, with its comfy furniture and its corner with toys for the kids, and a good selection of city and neighbourhood newspapers.

The incident occurred nearly four years ago but has waxed and waned in the public spotlight ever since. It's definitely in "waxing" mode right now with all the anti-racism protests following the brutal killing of George Floyd by a white police officer in Minnesota, and then a march this past Saturday specifically organized by the Justice for Abdi Coalition. Today on CBC's Ottawa Morning, former Bridgehead CEO Tracey Clark was interviewed along with anti-racism advocate Farhia Ahmed. Clark offered an almost grovelling mea-culpa-style apology for her reaction to the incident four years ago:

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1754840643742

But personally, I don't think she really had anything to apologize for. Here's the CBC news item from four years ago - I'll let you be the judge:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/bridgehead-owner-speaks-abdirahman-abdi-1.3708589

The thing is, there are a lot of sets of rights to be considered here. Abdi was a black man with a mental illness and and apparently a regular customer of the Wellington Street Bridgehead coffee shop. But whether he was in control of his actions or not, he was also physically strong and capable of considerable violence - as was clearly in evidence when he harassed and sexually assaulted at least half a dozen women. Could he have been treated more humanely? Yes. Did he deserve to die? No. But other people have rights too!

What about the women he assaulted? If even one of them had opted to pursue a complaint to the full extent of the law, we might be hearing a far more complex and convoluted story than what we're getting today. Not that I blame them - we have a long and not-so-proud history of painting female victims and survivors as guilty parties! I myself could tell my own story, though it's far less dramatic or traumatic. Back in the 1970s, a black security guard at the National Gallery of Canada (when it was still in the Lorne Building on Elgin Street) made a pass at me when I was there on a Thursday evening. I was wandering about the modern art when he asked something like "Are you staying at a hotel?" I said no and moved away to another artwork. Then I felt someone put a hand on my hair and shoulder. Startled, I looked around and he asked, "Are you scared?" "No," I said and escaped into a nearby stairwell. Fortunately that was the end of it. I did consider making a formal complaint but had the feeling that particular with him being black, my complaint would be construed as racist. And being busy with schoolwork and the like, it frankly felt like too much bother.

So anyway, my biggest concern would be for the women he assaulted. But I also feel for the staff and the other customers in the coffee shop. And also the police officers, who have a difficult job to do, are required to make split-second decisions and lack effective tools and social and community resources - and quite likely an adequate amount of training and education - to properly handle confrontations involving serious mental health problems.

So before we come out with knee-jerk demands to eliminate "police brutality" by "defunding" the police, let's take a cold hard look at how we treat ALL segments of society, whether that's black folks, women, the mentally ill, the poor or anyone we think of "different" or "other".

That's how things look to me. Am I missing something here?
I'm a racialized person. And so are you. From the moment I was conceived as an embryo, I was part of a race - the human race. Not yet a human being maybe, but certainly a being in progress.

Racism is definitely a hot topic these days. And with it comes the ongoing discussion about the terminology we should use to describe someone whose skin is not light in colour.

Black. African Canadian (or Afro-Canadian). Person of colour. Visible minority. Or the one that's rapidly gaining ground - racialized. I'm limiting myself here to terms that most people consider fairly polite and which may even have some official status. Of course, some of those terms are more specific than others, and I'm not going to even begin to enumerate all the various words in use to describe Canada's indigenous peoples.

I think mostly what bothers me about the term "racialized" is that it implies some sort of a choice on somebody's part. Like in the book Black Like Me where somebody deliberately darkens his skin to get a taste of what it's like to be a Black American. Or if that same person were to decide that he had a black brain or was black at heart and chose to undergo a kind of race affirmation surgery. Or even if it were imposed by someone else, as in a country under apartheid where everyone must be designated at birth as black or white or mixed-race or whatever. But that's not how we typically use the word "racialized".

One of the books I read in the past week was Robert Goldston's The Negro Revolution, written in 1968. After a brief prologue it starts with the slave trade in the mid 17th century and traces the history of black America through to 1968, just after the killing of Martin Luther King. I'd love to read a sequel to that book outlining the events of the past 50+ years!

It would also be interesting to read about Canadian developments over that same time period. People like Viola Desmond, who now graces our ten-dollar bills (though how much longer we'll be able to use cash at all, even post-pandemic, is an open question). Or even the infamous Peter Russell, who apparently was vehemently opposed to the abolition of slavery, and after whom the town and township of Russell (and presumably Russell Road as well) were named.

But let's get back to "racialized". I suppose up to a point, people should be allowed to self-identify in whatever way they choose. But you certainly can't please all the people all the time.

I don't particularly identify with the term "white" although if I have to tick a box on an official form, I've never rebelled in any way. I mean, even an albino doesn't necessarily have pure white skin.

So how exactly would I describe myself? English Canadian? Anglo-Canadian? Euro-Canadian or European Canadian? Maybe even Viking if those saliva tests have any validity?

It's a thorny issue and not one that easily lends itself to neat discrete categories.
I was quite surprised at the number of people who showed up in person at the anti-racism marches yesterday afternoon. Surprised too at the near-unanimous media praise and acclaim for these brave marchers risking life, limb and lungs in the midst of a pandemic, all to condemn racism and police brutality and support those whose skin colour has had a profound and lifelong negative impact on their day to day lives.

Are these marches unambiguously a Good Thing? At the risk of being branded a racist and a bigot, I'm going to say no. As with most things in life, the situation is far more nuanced than that.

But first the good news. At the Ottawa march at least, the event was peaceful. Given the various conflicting black community groups and anti-racist factions behind the scenes and the controversies over who was and was not welcome to attend, I had a real fear that things might escalate into violent confrontations. That didn't happen. People looked to be in good spirits, the police were present but kept to the sidelines. Street closures and re-openings appear to have taken place in an orderly fashion, once the route was made known. The Prime Minister was there, which also sends a powerful message. I don't know if the Mayor attended or not in the end - he was one of the people whom the organizers, No Peace Without Justice, had stated ought not to have been formally invited but was welcome to attend "as an individual".

And yet, I'd say many of the demonstrators were technically breaking the law, and certainly were violating established protocols. The law in Ontario banning gatherings of more than five people, for starters. In addition, not everyone was wearing a mask or practising physical distancing. How many additional cases of COVID-19 will we see in the aftermath of these marches? Surely events like this one belong to the final stage of re-opening, not the first stage.

It's all very well to be outraged about what happened in Minneapolis or Toronto or Halifax or anywhere else. Indeed, we SHOULD be outraged and I think nearly all of us are, whether we showed up to a march or not.

But I think something is seriously askew when we feel we mustn't criticize those who flock to mass protests like this one, however noble the cause, while meanwhile the parent whose kids (the least likely demographic for becoming ill with the virus) dare to play on the swings and slides at the local playground is slapped with a hefty fine!

Let's remember too that many of those injustices which are perpetrated right in our own back yards - or at least in our local parks and playgrounds - also have a racist component to them. For example, the case of Obi Ifedi, who was with his seven-year-old daughter in Michele Heights Park when a bylaw officer deliberately tripped him up, punched him in the mouth, handcuffed him, called for backup and slapped him with a fine of over $2000! The head of bylaw enforcement initially denied anything untoward had happened at all, although now there is apparently to be some sort of an "internal investigation" into the matter. It looks like the fine will be withdrawn. But the bylaw officer will NOT face criminal charges. We don't know if he will be fired or demoted. And to add insult to injury, we don't even know his name!!

So please, folks - let's be measured and reasonable about all this. Let's start by allowing smaller gatherings - friends, lovers, extended family or small groups of colleagues or other acquaintances Let's at least open up a few more venues where physical distancing is very feasible and masks or other protective measures may be used if needed. I don't understand, for example, why the farmers' market at Lansdowne Park could not be open for actual browsing, even if they have to limit the number of people there at any one time. Even with larger indoor spaces like museums, art galleries, cinemas, theatres or concert halls, surely we're getting to the point where we could open them for timed entry by a limited number of attendees? Nobody would be forced to attend if they feel they are particularly vulnerable!

It's not the way I ideally would have liked it to happen, but perhaps there's a glimmer of hope here. We've had a mass protest by thousands of people right here in sleepy little Ottawa, it was orderly and peaceful, and the sky didn't fall in. Maybe now the powers that be will see that we can start to relax the rules a bit?
One would think that with people mostly holed up at home, we would all enjoy far more privacy than ever before. Instead, it feels like the reverse is true.

Turn on your radio, TV, laptop, tablet or smartphone and you can be sure that someone will be barking orders at you. In some cases, your favourite device may insist you're doing something you're not allowed to do or being somewhere you're not allowed to be or that you've been in contact with someone who's suspect for whatever reason. Not only has the state entered the bedrooms of the nation but it's also intruding into the living rooms, kitchens, basements and bathrooms!

And when you do briefly venture out... well, that's when things kick into even higher gear. The T&T supermarket is apparently not only insisting that customers wear masks and sanitize their hands, it's also taking people's temperatures before allowing them inside. I don't know whether the new normal temperature is the same as the old normal one, or whether they're enlightened enough to recognize a range of temperatures as being "normal" but you can bet I'll never shop anywhere that insists on taking my temperature as long as I have other options! And just what part of your anatomy do they use to obtain your temperature? I don't know, although the possibilities are certainly mind-boggling! Of course, the one relatively untraceable payment option - cold hard cash - has also been outlawed under pandemic conditions.

Sigh!

It's perhaps a bit ironic that the Asian community, which from what I've heard is the most vulnerable to racism during the Covidian Crisis, is one of the ones that imposes super-intrusive conditions on entry to its stores.

Okay, so what about masks? While I've personally no objection to wearing a non-medical mask when I go out, I do find it ironic how certain jurisdictions will ban those articles of clothing that could be construed as religious symbols - hijabs, burqas, turbans, etc. - while simultaneously requiring masks and other PPE. A decade or so ago, I seem to recall a certain politician saying that in this country we show our faces to get government service. Even back then, I thought the statement quite ludicrous as in-person service outlets were progressively (or actually rather regressively) being eliminated. Now as then, I often feel treated not as a person or even a name, but just a number.

Ah, the brave new world of Covid-19!

Profile

blogcutter

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 03:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios