Happy International Special Librarians Day (ISLD) everyone! It has been 30 years since the first ISLD was announced. For that occasion I, along with many other colleagues in my profession, got a special kit from the Special Libraries association. I still have some items from that kit, most notably a coffee mug from which I drank my breakfast coffee this morning. The pens have long since been lost, discarded or given away but I do still have one or two pads of the sticky-notes and pin-on badges from that kit.

Every year there is a slightly different theme or slogan - the first was "Information Beyond Borders: Building Global Partnerships" and had a globe logo which was on all the publicity materials. Later, the name of the occasion was changed to Information Ethics Day:

https://targetstudy.com/knowledge/day/238/international-special-librarians-day-information-ethics-day.html

The idea of information ethics struck me as being particularly important as I read the recent book by Richard Ovenden (director of the Bodleian Library at Oxford), Burning The Books, in which he looks at instances of the destruction (whether deliberate or otherwise) of human knowledge in the form of books, archival documents and digital files throughout history.

Earlier this week, final drawings are to be released for the new superlibrary - a combined Ottwawa Public Library and Library & Archives Canada to be built at 555 Wellington:

https://inspire555.ca/welcome

All of which brings me to the recipient of my donation this week, the LAC (Library and Archives Canada) foundation:

https://lacfoundation.ca/

Books and reading have played a huge role in keeping me semi-sane during the pandemic and the long stretches of lockdowns and stay-at-home orders. I'm sure many, many people around the world feel the same way. So happy reading everyone, whatever your particular literary poison!
On Thursday, the new design for the new Library and Archives Canada plus Ottawa Public Library Main Branch was unveiled. It looks and sounds very promising! Unlike another building a few blocks east of it, the Chateau Laurier.

There are of course some valid reasons for this. The Chateau, although widely regarded as a historic and iconic building on the national capital landscape, has been privately owned for several decades, whereas the site at 555 Albert Street (formerly 555 Wellington) was already government-owned. Moreover, it's an extension to an existing building that is the subject of such ongoing distaste and controversy, whereas the new central library will be a whole new custom-built structure.
Still, the process whereby the final design, in each case, was arrived at is instructive.

In the case of the Chateau, the owners got to pick their own architects to come up with a design that fit the image they wanted to project to the well-heeled tourists they hoped to attract, only later dealing with pesky details like getting all the necessary zoning and heritage approvals from the powers that be. Ordinary folk like us may claim you can't fight City Hall but if you happen to be a big-name developer with a lot of money and other incentives to toss out, the rules somehow tend to be a bit different. Certainly they had to go through a few iterations before it all got approved and possibly they had to make a few token compromises, all no doubt well mapped-out in advance as part of their "negotiating" strategy of getting to yes.

But the central library, right from its inception, was meant to be designed by the people for the people. Of course it benefited from having more than one level of government on board, as well as some well-respected champions. But more importantly, it sought public input from all stakeholders on almost every imaginable aspect of its design, through its Inspire555 process, right from day one. It held in-person focus groups and online consultations and kept people informed through their preferred channel(s) of communication. To use a much-overused adjective, though I find it perfectly apt in this case, the process was very TRANSPARENT. What a contrast with, say, the LRT. Or the rest of Lebreton Flats.

The building respects the unique topography and location of the site, too. It's designed to be "green" and energy-efficient and to have the necessary spaces to appeal to different demographic and cultural communities. Perhaps the worst public controversy it generated was over how "central" it was, given that it will lie somewhere west of what is widely considered to be Ottawa's downtown "core". But in a metropolitan area of our size (in terms of population, geography and politics), the core is ever-expanding. Geographically, I understand the mid-point of the city would actually be somewhere around Carleton University, certainly farther west than Lebreton Flats. We're very spread out. While the city has technically only recently surpassed the million mark in terms of population, if you include the Quebec municipalities - Gatineau (including Hull and Aylmer), Chelsea, Buckingham and so on - we've had over a million people for quite some time.

So personally I'm very much looking forward to the new building. If I were to cite one concern, which I hope can be overcome, it would be that in spite of all the wonderful research resources, cultural and entertainment and cosy and luxurious indoor and outdoor spaces it is to include, we may become so preoccupied with security checks and street violence and terrorism and other big-city problems that people will all be required to enter and exit through the same door and submit to so many rules and regulations that it will no longer be a pleasant place for any of us!

I credit our recently-retired Librarian and Archivist of Canada, Guy Berthiaume, with bringing this project to fruition (or at least the planning phase to fruition). Along with Marianne Scott, who is still very active in the Friends of LAC activities, I think he ranks as one of the best heads of the organization that it's had. During his tenure, he had all kinds of day-time activities open to the Friends - panels of international guests from other national libraries and cultural organizations, for example; lunchtime speakers and interviews; book launches; all of which I really appreciated as a retired person. I'm hoping that Leslie Weir will get more into these kinds of things as well. She's certainly well qualified for the role, having worked both at the LAC and as uOttawa's university librarian, as well as in the School of Information Studies there. In fact, she was one of the people I suggested in this blog as a worthy successor to Berthiaume's rather disastrous predecessor. She's only been in the position for a few months - since September 2019 - so it's early days yet.

Anyway, back to the new building, slated to open in 2024. I have high hopes that if anything can finally spark a vibrant new people-place-style redevelopment of Lebreton Flats, this may be it.

Then maybe we'll see a new downtown Via Rail station again? A new thirst for an underground city in Ottawa, along the lines of those in Montreal and Toronto, for example? Will we finally come of age as an interesting metropolis, instead of the town that fun forgot?

We can always hope.
I'm going to take a nostalgic stroll down memory lane today, and follow up with my recommendations for the next Librarian and Archivist of Canada.

When Marianne Scott retired as National Librarian, government librarians were virtually unanimous in their assertion that the next National Librarian, like Ms. Scott, should be a professional librarian. Now, you would think that this had been the case back several decades or so, but in fact, Marianne Scott was the first National Librarian to actually have library credentials! She has continued since her retirement to advocate for our profession, enthusiastically participating in the various Ex Libris activities in the Ottawa area and generally attending our annual conference in Toronto as well.

So what did the government in its wisdom do? Well, they appointed Roch Carrier, author of The Hockey Sweater and various other well-regarded stories and books, as National Librarian. He was a charming person, but not a librarian. Still, he was good with the public and certainly understood some of our issues like copyright and the public lending right. He respected librarians and was well aware that digitization is expensive and not everything is available on the Internet. And at least the National Archivist of Canada was someone with a background in the archival profession (and he later became head of the consolidated institution).

Still in the late 1990s, we had the English Report (named after committee chairman John English) on the future of the National Library and National Archives of Canada. In those days, government librarians were actually CONSULTED on their views as to the appropriate direction for these auspicious institutions to take! I remember contributing my views to this exercise, as did many of my colleagues.

Although librarians, archivists and other information professionals certainly do not all think alike, one thing that emerged loud and clear from our profession was that the National Librarian and the National Archivist should be two separate, distinct offices and people since, although they had some professional goals in common, their mandates were quite different. So what did the government of the day do? Why, they completely ignored us, of course, amalgamating the National Library and National Archives as the "Library and Archives of Canada". This put CISTI (the Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, formerly known as the National Science Library, and the library for Canada's National Research Council) in a distinct limbo: previously, CISTI had been the national library for publications in the fields of science and technology, while the National Library of Canada had been responsible for published works in the humanities and social sciences. The National Archives (formerly the Public Archives), on the other hand, had been responsible for UNPUBLISHED works in all fields, including government records.

A series of unpopular decisions followed. The Canadian Book Exchange Centre closed its doors. Interlibrary loans were cancelled, as was the free Internet service in public libraries across Canada. Librarians, archivists and other information professionals were laid off in droves. I'm very thankful that I was able to retire in 2009 with a reasonable pension. Employees of the Library and Archives Canada are being saddled with a restrictive code of conduct that brands things like teaching and attending or presenting papers at conferences as "high risk" and disloyal activities! Funny, when I taught at Algonquin College during my days as a government librarian, I always regarded it as a welcome prod to keeping up to date in my profession and being able to give my all to my primary employer!

Fast forward to May 2013, and the welcome news that Librarian and Archivist of Canada Daniel J. Caron had resigned. Other library and archival professionals will no doubt be coming forward with their own suggestions in the near future, but here are a few of my own.

My first recommendation: Dr. Tom Delsey. He was a professor of library science at the University of Western Ontario (now known simply as Western University) in the mid-1970s. He could get quite animated about arcane points of cataloguing like name and subject authority files. And just when I was graduating at the end of December, 1976, he was also planning to move on to a senior position in the Cataloguing Branch at the National Library of Canada. It surprised me a bit, as I had always regarded him as very much an academic, but he definitely knew his stuff and was an excellent advocate for librarians back when they were revamping the whole LS job classification to merge it into the Universal Classification Standard. He later retired and joined the University of Ottawa as it was setting up a School of Information Studies, ending a long hiatus without any library education at the Masters' level in Ottawa (a terrible irony given the number of federal libraries in the area - many of which have now closed their doors).

My second recommendation: Barbara Clubb, the former City Librarian. She has won all kinds of awards and oversaw the amalgamation of the Ottawa, Gloucester, Nepean and Kanata public library systems at the beginning of this millennium. She's fluently bilingual, good with the public and would never stand for this "by appointment only" nonsense that prevails now at the Library and Archives of Canada (necessitated, I hasten to add, by the vast number of layoffs of professional librarians and archivists). Having a public library background, she also, I suspect, has a practical bent that might not be so true of Tom Delsey. I think she would lobby very hard for getting that free Internet service back into public libraries and eliminating the yawning gap between the information- and education-rich vs. the information/education-poor. And she's very supportive of mainstream fiction - I remember how enthusiastically she participated in the books panel on CBC radio in the late afternoons (before CBC was decimated by those draconian cuts!)

My final recommendation: Leslie Weir, another career librarian who, like Tom Delsey, used to work at the National Library, Library Systems Centre, and now is employed as a librarian at the University of Ottawa. I don't think she has a PhD but like Barbara Clubb, she is bilingual and does come across as a practical person who would soon restore interlibrary loan service and strive to put the Library and Archives back on its feet.

Are any of these people willing and available? I don't know. And unfortunately, I don't know of anyone on the archival side, nor anyone just entering the profession or perhaps in mid-career, who might be an equally good or better candidate.

The next few months are going to be interesting!
It's always a challenge to plan my trips to Toronto for a part of the week when I can get to the things I want to go to. Sleuth of Baker Street is now only open from Thursday to Sunday. Many museums and other attractions are closed Mondays. And my Ex Libris Board meetings are always scheduled for Tuesdays.

This time, the Ex Libris Toronto-based people had scheduled an optional tour of the Bata Shoe Museum and library, followed by lunch, for the Monday. So I decided to go to Toronto on the Sunday morning, arriving in time to get to Sleuth before their 4 PM closing time, sign up for the tour and lunch on the Monday, get to my Board meeting on Tuesday, returning to Ottawa on Wednesday. I stayed at the Holiday Inn on Bloor, about midway between the zillionaires' shopping strip on my left and the studenty area of all-night groceries and vegetarian eateries on my right. Also right near Remenyi Music, which sells instruments and related paraphernalia, as well as a good selection of sheet music.

The Bata Shoe Museum was directly across the street from my hotel. We got to see the special exhibit on Sneaker Culture (which included one of the pairs of sneakers Terry Fox had worn on his abortive cross-Canada run), as well as a fascinating library which can only be visited by prior appointment; they also collect socks for the Toronto homeless. Just along the street a couple of blocks was the Royal Ontario Museum, which to my pleasant surprise was also open on the Monday. I spent quite a while after lunch looking through the textiles area on the top floor, working my way downwards through a fascinating display of home decor through the centuries, followed by a brief visit to the dinosaurs, mammals and bat cave before returning to my hotel. On the Tuesday, my Board meeting was over by about 1:30, so I went over to the Art Gallery to visit a spectacular special exhibition of treasures from Renaissance Italy. The highlight for me was the illuminated manuscripts, in particular one of Dante's Divine Comedy. No matter how much digitization gets accomplished, nothing can compare to seeing it in the flesh... or do I mean parchment? I also saw (and heard and walked through) a number of the contemporary exhibits, one by Etrog somebody (a film that he made as well as static art inspired by Samuel Beckett, Ionesco and other theatre-of-the-absurd folks and various sculptural constructs) and a number of multimedia-type displays or installations or whatever by various artists.

But the Board meeting was the reason I was in Toronto in the first place. We've been protesting and raising awareness of the way Library and Archives Canada (LAC)and the library, archival and related resources and professions are being essentially rent asunder by the current regime. The response to our letter-writing campaign has been an exercise in the kind of pass-the-buck-ology that typifies bureaucracy at its worst. After failing to get any kind of response from Heritage Minister James Moore's office, our Ex Libris president some months later sent a letter to the Prime Minister - and actually got an answer from someone on his staff. It said that our concerns had been noted and that this fell under the purview of the Minister of Heritage who "will no doubt wish to respond shortly" or words to that effect. Well, lo and behold, we finally got a response back from Moore's office, indicating that the LAC operated at arms' length from Heritage and as such, we had been following the proper course all along in writing to Daniel Caron, the head of LAC (who likewise had not replied).

On Wednesday, of course, Caron announced his resignation. Did we have anything to do with that? Maybe. Maybe with that $5000 worth of private Spanish lessons under his belt, he'll be able to get another job in some far-flung country under our NAFTA employment exchange agreements.

So who will be his replacement? Will she or he be an improvement? I live in hope!
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 11:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios