blogcutter

Gabriel Wortman. Brenton Tarrant. Marc Lépine. Voldemort.

For some, the mere utterance of these names is an act of unspeakable violence. For me, that attitude is a load of superstitious and even dangerous nonsense. Magical thinking at its worst.

Justin Trudeau is the latest leader to urge media restraint in publishing the name or photograph of a mass killer, but he's certainly not the only one. Here is a Global News analysis of the issue:

https://globalnews.ca/news/6841959/nova-scotia-shooting-naming-shooter-trudeau/

What happened in Portapique Nova Scotia this past weekend was literally a tragedy of pandemic proportions. It deserves to be reported with an appropriate degree of accuracy and solemnity, while respecting the privacy and the needs of the victims' families, friends and community to grieve in their own ways and celebrate the lives of those they have lost. During a pandemic lockdown, that's challenging but I would hope, not impossible.

Sensitive editorial policy is important but so is freedom of the press. There's often a fine line between restraint and censorship.

To suggest that those who go on killing rampages be relegated to the ranks of them-who-must-not-be-named is quite simply to deny reality. It's kind of like taking the "strong" form of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and perverting it to the point of absurdity. If we don't name someone or mention a specific event, then clearly they have never even existed or happened!

Gosh, wouldn't it be great if we just stopped talking about Covid-19? Or naming ANY viruses or diseases? That way, we could wipe them right off the face of the planet!!

I'm quite uncomfortable with the whole "no notoriety" movement, although I'm sure proponents of it would not go as far as I may have implied. See for yourself:

https://nonotoriety.com

To be fair, I think we all have superstitious moments and moments when we have to fight the temptation to live in a state of denial. You know the sort of thing: I won't get that lump looked at, because what if it's cancer? Or even when there may be a happy result: I won't admit that I think I did well on that exam because supposing I jinx myself? We humans are indeed a bewildering mixture of the rational and the irrational. But once we've taken a few minutes to wallow in our irrational and often uncharitable impulses, we need to be able to take a step back and look at things from a levelheaded perspective before we boldly go where angels fear to tread!

Talk about 2020 hindsight. This year marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World War Two. I look outside and there are tulips in the front garden.

Lest we forget?

Hi again and welcome back to the blogcutter's café. One of the most important roles of the media in a democratic society is to expose the plight of the underdog, thereby generating righteous indignation and embarrassing the powers that be, or "overdogs" if you will, into doing the right thing. One master of that process is columnist Hugh Adami, who writes "The Public Citizen" column in the Ottawa Citizen.

In yesterday's column, Adami publicized the plight of Dan Brown, a security guard ousted from his job at NRC because somebody apparently complained he couldn't speak French. Does anyone remember the joke about the lifeguard who didn't save the drowning child because he couldn't swim - but he COULD speak French?

Now don't get me wrong. I love living in a bilingual milieu. Every language you learn is a new system for cataloguing your world, a new set of glasses through which to view your reality. But it must be said that more language and more languages does not always mean more or better communication. In fact, during my years in government, memo-writers often erred on the side of shorter and more cryptic communication because they knew it would have to be translated, and time was of the essence. I recall one particular instance when we were in the throes of reorganization, of a memo sent out to Headquarters and all the regions, where we had to do some research and dig up some information. Since I didn't fully understand it and didn't want to waste anyone's precious time, I phoned the project leader for clarification. I got that clarification but, as I pointed out to her, what she in fact was asking was something very different from what she had written in her original e-mail. I suggested she might want to sent out a follow-up e-mail to all the original recipients of the first one. If I had misunderstood it, chances are some of the other recipients might have as well. But no, she couldn't do that, she insisted, because if she took the time to craft such an e-mail, it would then have to be translated, and so on and so forth. So instead, I believe what ended up happening was she had to talk with each of the recipients individually, except maybe to those who didn't phone her for clarification (who probably went off and performed the wrong research). What a horrendous waste!

Another recent injustice in the Ottawa area that has had a certain amount of publicity lately has been the closing of Nicholas Hoare Books on Sussex Drive. The National Capital Commission raised the bookstore's already sky-high rent by a whopping 74% - and the markup on books is not high enough for the owner to make a go of things. Most commentators on the issue have been pro-bookstore, although a couple of influential columnists have come down on the other side too. What they may not realize is that Nicholas Hoare Books has been a great asset to the Ottawa community over the years. They were instrumental in establishing the wonderful "Books and Brunch" series at the Chateau Laurier (which regrettably marginalized it over the years, possibly due to the influence of Fairmont assuming responsibility for the property). They have sold tickets and passes to the semiannual Ottawa Writers' Festival since its inception. And of course, they have held numerous in-store book-related and other cultural events - book signings, gatherings of librarians, twelfth-night celebrations, the list goes on! I still hold out a small hope that with the attendant publicity, the NCC will see fit to do the right thing and back down on the rent increase.

Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are important human rights but, as our Charter makes clear in its preamble, no right is absolute, and there's the rub. We have things like "hate crime" legislation which inhibits or suppresses free speech and thereby, in my view, merely lends credence to the extremist views of certain factions. We have court settlements, the terms of which must not be publicly disclosed. And one biggie, which I'll have to save for another day - the veil of secrecy surrounding child "protection" proceedings which allows Children's Aid Societies to function virtually as a law unto themselves. And that is where I shall conclude my posting for today.