If you want your children to have a complete set of Dr. Seuss books in their home library, you'll have to act fast. Six of them will henceforth no longer be published, as they apparently contain racist images:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/dr-seuss-books-publication-racist-images-1.5933033

I find it all quite interesting really. In my young day, the censors railed on about children's literature that lacked literary merit. Chief among them were series books like Nancy Drew, Hardy Boys, Bobbsey Twins, Cherry Ames, Trixie Belden, Donna Parker... plus many more that I've either forgotten about or never encountered. Mind you, if literary merit were the prime consideration, it's difficult to understand how Dick and Jane gained such a foothold in the educational system. But I digress.

Fast forward to the next generation. With the GenX and Millennial sets, it seemed the censors were more worried about promoting "family values", a phrase they interpreted in a very limited way. Books were if anything censored for being TOO progressive. Families with gay or transgendered parents or youngsters were definite no-nos and even incidental mention of monogamous heterosexuality could be cause for concern. Nudity was suspect, although allowed in some circumstances - I'm remembering the furore over the Show Me books in the 70s. And believe it or not, even a seemingly innocuous Beatrix Potter classic once landed us in hot water with Children's Aid.

Maybe that's part of the reason that many 21st century parents are so quick to censor any works that involve stereotypes, regardless of their literary merit or their capacity to inform or entertain. In fact, it's not only children's books that we are taking this approach with (abolition of the "N-word", anyone?) Would it not be better to use those stereotyped depictions and descriptions as a springboard for thoughtful discussion, reflection and planning for the society we want moving forward?

It's said that we must know our history if we are to avoid repeating it. It's also been postulated that the myths, fairy tales, nursery rhymes, songs and other elements of the republic of childhood reflect certain universal aspects of our human psyche. Without question, they are an important aspect of our shared cultural heritage. But are they realistic? Certainly not, if we mean the question in a literal sense. We don't mingle with dragons and unicorns on a day-to-day basis. Stepmothers are not necessarily wicked and godmothers are not necessarily fairies.

But whoever said literature had to be realistic?
It was bound to happen before long. Parents, teachers and other significant adults in kids' lives are desperate for ways to explain Covid-19 to the kids in simple terms, all while still struggling to understand it themselves. With limits on in-person communication, they rely more and more on books, TV shows and other kidmedia.

Loukia Zigoumis, an Ottawa mother, aunt and lifestyle blogger in collaboration with her own mother, well-known children's author Katerina Mertikas, has produced a 28-page picture book for younger kids. Proceeds from the sale of the book will support CHEO (which held its annual telethon yesterday) and the Kids' Help Phone. Details may be found here:

https://www.ottawamatters.com/helpers/childrens-book-explaining-covid-19-life-also-raising-money-for-cheo-kids-help-phone-2401108?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

Meanwhile in B.C., Orca Books recently published a book for middle-grade readers, Don't Stand So Close to Me:

https://www.orcabook.com/Dont-Stand-So-Close-to-Me-P4843.aspx

As a grandmother and retired librarian, I naturally am following these developments with great interest. I also have long been fascinated by the possibilities of bibliotherapy, journalling and poetry therapy, music therapy and art therapy. Kids themselves have also shown considerable creativity and ingenuity in projects they have gotten off the ground to help others impacted by the pandemic.

Of course, documents from the pandemic can be significant as much for what they DON'T say as for what they do say. I've been doing a very informal analysis of some of the literature, much of which had to be hastily put together to meet immediate needs. Some of it really looks quite good, but I'm wondering how enduring it will be. And how will today's kids approach educating and socializing THEIR kids when pandemics strike in future generations?

In the non-pandemic reading I've been doing over the past few months, I've been struck by how many books, written decades or even centuries ago, casually refer to someone standing about two yards away, or about six feet away, when the literary situation has nothing whatsoever to do with pandemics or epidemics or self-isolation. Perhaps in some ways, our ancestors had a better grasp of healthy living than we do! I think we can be a little too quick to dismiss intuitive or intrinsic social knowledge and assume that everything is either (on the one hand) based on objective logic and scientific evidence (and therefore necessarily or probably true) OR (on the other hand) "fake news", celebrity culture or spam (and therefore false).

We need, I think, to have more respect for the arts, for anecdotal evidence, emotion, gut instinct and storytelling, to name but a few sources of wisdom.
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 09:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios