Slowly but uncertainly, the options for going out somewhere interesting are expanding. Beaches and splash pads are mostly open. Some beaches even have water wheelchairs for folks with disabilities. The Ottawa Art gallery has reopened, in a limited way. You have to reserve a time (a two-hour window) online beforehand and they're only open Wednesdays through Sundays. Still, in the 10 AM to noon slot, they give priority to seniors and there were still slots open when I last checked. Given that OC Transpo is free for seniors on Wednesdays, I may book a Wednesday morning slot n the near future, perhaps in a week or two.

As for the National Gallery, it will be reopening July 16 and 17 for members only, and Saturday for the general public. It will only be open Thursdays through Sundays. The Ingenium series of museums will be re-opening during August, starting with the agricultural museum on August 1. Aviation and Space opens August 8 and Science and Technology on August 14. There too, members will be allowed in slightly before the rest (July 20 and 31; August 6 and 7; August 12 and 13). And it seems that they too will only be open on a Wednesday through Sunday or Thursday through Sunday schedule and they want you to pre-book online. I don't know about the War Museum or the Museum of History. The Museum of Nature was planning for a September re-opening last I heard. It will be interesting to see which exhibits are open and which ones remain closed off for now. I guess it will be easier for the "look but don't touch" places like art galleries than for somewhere like the Museum of Science and Technology or the Children's Museum, which have always been very hands-on oriented.

It's progress, although it all seems a bit of a hassle. Having to pre-book means the day you've reserved may turn out to be the kind of stiflingly hot day when you don't feel like going anywhere. I'm also concerned that I might get super-exhausted if the café facilities are all closed and there's no place to sit down and enjoy a coffee or cold drink or snack. It also seems to me it would be better if they could all re-open on a 6 days-a-week schedule (though maybe still with reduced hours each day to facilitate regular cleaning) - if nothing else, it would make things easier for physical distancing.

Last week when the temperatures soared to unbearable levels, we enjoyed our first ice cream cone of the season at Purple Cow. It was a different experience from last year - we had to line up outside as there were two couples or pairs of people ahead of us and we were all masked. But it didn't take too long. Another day we drove to the Shouldice stand on Prince of Wales and got a big basket of strawberries and a smaller basket of tomatoes.

So we enjoy the small pleasures in life where we can get them. I still think we could be allowed to do more. Reopening playground equipment is long overdue. And reopening movie theatres, including the special screenings like Stars and Strollers, would allow people to escape into air-conditioned comfort. It might be necessary to block off some of the seats but when I think of how South Keys, for example, used to regularly hold daytime screenings (even the cheap Tuesday ones) attended by perhaps half a dozen people, it strikes me as ludicrous that we're not reopening them now while the summer heat is upon us, the kids are off school and would-be vacationers have nowhere else to go.
When you look at pictures in an art gallery, how much attention do you pay to the frames they are in?

When I've particularly noticed frames at a gallery, it's usually been because I considered them to be overly ornate - too much gold paint or elaborate moulding - to the point that they distract and detract from the paintings and drawings that they frame. But perhaps that's just my modern sensibilities? After all, it seems to me a lot of modern works of art don't have any frame at all - I can't quite picture "Voice of Fire" in a frame, for example, although admittedly I didn't go back and look at it before writing this blog entry.

If I thought about it at all, I assumed that galleries pretty much used the frame they acquired the picture in, or if it didn't come in any sort of suitable frame, went and got a stock frame of some sort out of their storage rooms that would match the other picture frames in the room where the picture was to be displayed.

However, I certainly re-examined that assumption when I received a National Gallery members' letter asking me to consider making a donation, as a "patron of the arts" (what value flattery?) towards the purchase of an 18th century period frame for Benjamin West's famous painting, "The Death of General Wolfe". According to the letter, such period frames are works of art in themselves, handcrafted by skilled designers and craftspeople "attuned to the demanding expectations of the artists and patrons of the day ... [to provide] a window to view and celebrate the work as it was intended." Wow. Unfortunately, there was no mention of how much money they need to raise in order to buy or bid on such a frame, an omission which makes it more difficult for me to decide how much I would like to donate, if indeed I make a donation at all.

I guess it's the same principle as "You can't judge a book by its cover": if a great book has a bad cover, or one that doesn't reflect the type or tone of the book's contents, you're likely to dismiss the book out of hand. Still, I've changed my thinking somewhat about picture frames. Previously, I thought they should in most cases be as unobtrusive as possible; now I can see how in some circumstances at least, they can be part of the integrity or totality of the work of art.
Page generated Mar. 13th, 2026 10:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios