Entry tags:
Choosing what to read
In his latest blog post, David Headley of Goldsboro Books in the U.K. asks: Do you trust an algorithm to tell you what to read? :
https://goldsborobooks.com/blogs/news/do-you-trust-an-algorithm-to-tell-you-what-to-read?mc_cid=79cf372777&mc_eid=47fc6ebfe4
He makes some valid, if rather obvious points about trapping you into reading what you've always read and closing off the delightfully elusive and ineffable processes involved in serendipity.
Here's how I would respond.
No, I wouldn't necessarily trust an algorithm. But depending on how sophisticated the algorithm is, it can be an interesting parlour game to find out what the recommendation system thinks I might like. If some of its suggestions sound appealing, I would certainly see if my library or independent bookshop has them available, and find out more about them.
If I'm able to devise my own algorithm or search strategy, or if I have some flexibility to refine theirs, that's great too. That's precisely what I used to do in my working life as a librarian, whether conducting a reference interview, looking in available reference sources, consulting with colleagues or following up on my hunches. It's what I still do now if I'm looking for reading matter.
Can hunches be automated? I think the jury is still out.
Of course, people tend to be consistently inconsistent too. What I'm in the mood for right now may not be what I feel like reading next week or next year. Moreover, telling people they should not or must not read something because it's erroneous, disgusting, hateful or obscene will often make them all the more determined to get their hands on it. Banning a book can be a sure-fire recipe for its success.
I do think sometimes very basic recommendations like "If you like Author A, you may enjoy Authors X, Y and Z" are somewhat useful. There are familiar comfort-reads and then there are challenging or interesting reads that you'd like to discuss with others and that make great book club selections.
Human reader advisory services are still a thing, both in bricks-and-mortar libraries and online. There are plenty of good independent sites out there too. Here's an extensive one I found recently and really like:
catherinerosegunther.com
How do you decide what's going to be your next read? Do you generally read one book at a time or do you generally have two or three on the go at once? And where do magazines, newspapers, newsletters etc. fit into the overall picture?
https://goldsborobooks.com/blogs/news/do-you-trust-an-algorithm-to-tell-you-what-to-read?mc_cid=79cf372777&mc_eid=47fc6ebfe4
He makes some valid, if rather obvious points about trapping you into reading what you've always read and closing off the delightfully elusive and ineffable processes involved in serendipity.
Here's how I would respond.
No, I wouldn't necessarily trust an algorithm. But depending on how sophisticated the algorithm is, it can be an interesting parlour game to find out what the recommendation system thinks I might like. If some of its suggestions sound appealing, I would certainly see if my library or independent bookshop has them available, and find out more about them.
If I'm able to devise my own algorithm or search strategy, or if I have some flexibility to refine theirs, that's great too. That's precisely what I used to do in my working life as a librarian, whether conducting a reference interview, looking in available reference sources, consulting with colleagues or following up on my hunches. It's what I still do now if I'm looking for reading matter.
Can hunches be automated? I think the jury is still out.
Of course, people tend to be consistently inconsistent too. What I'm in the mood for right now may not be what I feel like reading next week or next year. Moreover, telling people they should not or must not read something because it's erroneous, disgusting, hateful or obscene will often make them all the more determined to get their hands on it. Banning a book can be a sure-fire recipe for its success.
I do think sometimes very basic recommendations like "If you like Author A, you may enjoy Authors X, Y and Z" are somewhat useful. There are familiar comfort-reads and then there are challenging or interesting reads that you'd like to discuss with others and that make great book club selections.
Human reader advisory services are still a thing, both in bricks-and-mortar libraries and online. There are plenty of good independent sites out there too. Here's an extensive one I found recently and really like:
catherinerosegunther.com
How do you decide what's going to be your next read? Do you generally read one book at a time or do you generally have two or three on the go at once? And where do magazines, newspapers, newsletters etc. fit into the overall picture?